Student-Centerered Higher Education Ecosystem
My philosophy of a student-centered higher education plan. Including active learning in a virtual class environment allows students to build on their weaknesses and add to their strengths. Students will gain a higher order of thinking which will allow the discovery, comprehension of prior knowledge to merge with new knowledge. Technology integrated with course design can benefit diverse learning styles. There something for every student. The goal is a diverse and inclusive online learning environment for student learning styles.
|
|
The mind map I created illustrates my schema of e-learning in higher education incorporating active learning methods for students in virtual environments.
The following word cloud articulates what I believe are the ten most important considerations in the instructional design process in higher education and contain distinctive methods.
The pallet word wall provides insight into my theory of online teaching and learning in higher education. The resources in the word wall include blended methods used for higher order of thinking actively engaging and supporting student cognitive development in a virtual environment.
My pinterest board displays a model for online higher education ecosystems student-centered learning environment.
https://www.pinterest.com/carlton3586/student-centered-eco-system/
Part 1 Ecosystem Plan
Part 2 Ecosystem Plan
The following resources are referenced in my Technology Integration Plan
The Department of Education (2020). https://tech.ed.gov/publications/digital-learning-guide/teacher/
retrieved on April 14, 2021.
The Columbia Center for Teaching and Learning (2020)
https://ctl.columbia.edu/resources-and-technology/teaching-with-technology/teaching-online/inclusive-teaching/
Retrieved on April 13, 2021
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook: Cognitive domains. New York: David McKay.
Kruse, S. D., Rakha, S., & Calderone, S. (2018). Developing cultural competency in higher education: An agenda for practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(6), 733-750.
Miller, M. (2014). Minds online. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 21(3), 166-190.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231. google scholar
Mitchell, A., Petter, S., & Harris, A. L. (2017). Learning by doing: Twenty successful active learning exercises for information systems courses. Journal of Information technology education: Innovations in Practice, 16(1), 21-46.
Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J.V. (2018). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed.) New York, NY: Pearson.
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-28.
Williams, K. C., & Williams, C. C. (2011). Five key ingredients for improving student motivation. Research in Higher Education Journal, 12, 1.
retrieved on April 14, 2021.
The Columbia Center for Teaching and Learning (2020)
https://ctl.columbia.edu/resources-and-technology/teaching-with-technology/teaching-online/inclusive-teaching/
Retrieved on April 13, 2021
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook: Cognitive domains. New York: David McKay.
Kruse, S. D., Rakha, S., & Calderone, S. (2018). Developing cultural competency in higher education: An agenda for practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(6), 733-750.
Miller, M. (2014). Minds online. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 21(3), 166-190.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231. google scholar
Mitchell, A., Petter, S., & Harris, A. L. (2017). Learning by doing: Twenty successful active learning exercises for information systems courses. Journal of Information technology education: Innovations in Practice, 16(1), 21-46.
Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J.V. (2018). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th ed.) New York, NY: Pearson.
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-28.
Williams, K. C., & Williams, C. C. (2011). Five key ingredients for improving student motivation. Research in Higher Education Journal, 12, 1.